Dear Ian.

[...]

1. The manual partition installer that I had to use [...] there is a kind of medium level of knowledge that allows manual installation but could benefit with a good practices overview and a suggestion (even if it may be needed to be applied manually in a manual install).

I agree with you. It seems like Guix has two options for partitioning, completely manual setup (outside the installer, using fdisk, parted, or similar tools), or completely automatic (in the text-graphical installer). A "semi-automatic" mode in the installer would be very helpful.

I think that too!

In a way, the same automatic installer we already have could be reused, only that instead of using "all disk space" could be pointed to "use free space" or "use that specific partition". Then it would do the same as when on all the disk, only that within some specific boundaries.

The graphical installer doesn’t support configuring swap with encryption. To do this effectively, it would need LVM support. The approach taken by other distros (ex. Debian) is to create a LUKS partition holding a LVM volume group, and put root and swap logical volumes inside it. This setup allows a single passphrase to unlock all volumes.

Do we have some reference about how to do this? It sounds great, except that now I must do it by hand.

2. During that installation, there is a question about the cypher tag (in Spanish "etiqueta de cifrado"). [...]

This is odd, I don’t think I get asked this when I use the installer with US
English.

Oh! Could it be because I made a manual install? (I mean, not because of
language but because the chosen path).

4. When the installation ended and after rebooting I've found with real anguish that the other bootable partition was not present in the grub menu. [...] *being able to keep their current working OSs andd partitions lowers a lot the barrier to try guix*. And more guix users are good for everyone in this community and the guix mission in general. :)

I agree with this.

/\

5. Contrasting with the previous, this last point is really a very small one. [...] I'd like to argue that since it is such a common and fundamental tool for most people these days (we can debate if this is good and/or desirable), if it is within our reach by default we should provide one. Anyone would do, no matter how simple.

The ask is reasonable, but this is difficult to do and dangerous; on balance, I think we shouldn’t.

Since Guix is a rolling release distribution, and web browsers are full of vulnerabilities, installing a web browser during installation means installing a vulnerable one. [...]

OK, nothing from me here. If we can't do it with a minimum of quality now, we don't do it now.

Thanks a lot for your thoughtful reply... :D

Best...



--
eduardo mercovich

Donde se cruzan tus talentos con las necesidades del mundo, ahí está tu vocación. (Anónimo)

Reply via email to