On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:51:17 +0200 (CEST) sauer wrote: 

n> Speaking of the standard library, what are the chances of more
n> formally documenting the miniumum version requirement for using that
n> file?  I updated it recently, and found that I had to comment out a
n> few chunks to retain compatability with some older binary versions
n> (which, for a variety of reasons, I can't immediately update).  It's
n> not the end of the world to have to keep commenting parts out, but it
n> reminded me that it's never been quite clear what the lifecycle is for
n> old releases. :)

The intent is that the current version in Design Center as
CFEngine::stdlib will be the last one to lack that specificity.  From
now on, every new CFEngine::stdlib release that has incompatibilities
will cause the old one to be rotated out to CFEngine::stdlib::x_y_z
where x_y_z is the last Community version it could use.  So if you are
above x.y.z you are fine.  If not, you use the best one that suits you.

I would take patches to add a CFEngine::stdlib::3.?.? to the Design
Center that you have verified.  I don't know what particular versions
you're concerned with, but everyone benefits if we make your knowledge
part of Design Center.

Ted

_______________________________________________
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine

Reply via email to