Should be pretty trivial. The code is basically there but hidden

http://www.cfengine.org/manuals/cf3-reference.html#port-in-runagent

If you register a feature request, be sure to explain the scenario to
make sure we understand

M

On 12/16/2010 04:03 PM, Deb Heller-Evans wrote:
> Seva,
> 
> Yes, I think that's it.
> I wonder how hard it would be to add this functionality...
> 
> deb
> 
> On 12/16/10 6:53 AM, Seva Gluschenko wrote:
>> Deb,
>>
>> you mean source port, don't you? Unfortunately, there's no such option
>> in Cfengine, AFAIK. Probably, a high time for the feature request?
>>
>> 2010/12/16 Deb Heller-Evans<d...@es.net>:
>>> Thanks, Seve!  Sorry, that was a typo on the port number.  But, I think I
>>> didn't make my point very well.  Let me try again.
>>>
>>> I am not wanting to change the port number.  I need to direct communication
>>> from the cfengine server to the target host via VPNGW-IPaddr:Portnumber
>>> which will ultimately do the right thing to get to the target host inside
>>> the VPN.
>>>
>>> What I want to do is similar to using bindtointerface, but I need to ALSO
>>> specify a port number on the VPN-GW.  For example, bindtointerface syntax
>>> currently looks like this in promises.cf: (Given that VPN-GW is
>>> 123.45.6.234)
>>>
>>> targethost_es_net::
>>> bindtointerface =>  "123.45.6.234";
>>>
>>> What this does is tell cfengine to talk to the VPN-GW to get to the target
>>> host.  But of course this won't work because there's no way the VPN-GW will
>>> know what to do with cfengine packets. But, if bindtointerface allowed me to
>>> specify a port number on the VPN-GW (which is configured to direct packets
>>> from this port to the target), maybe something like this:
>>>
>>> (Given:
>>> VPN-GW is 123.45.6.234
>>> Port number on VPN-GW NAT'd to target host: 4567)
>>>
>>> targethost_es_net::
>>> bindtointerface =>  "123.45.6.234:4567"
>>>
>>> Then when the packet reached the VPN-GW on port 4567, it's NAT protocol
>>> would direct those packets to targethost_es_net which is *inside* the VPN.
>>>
>>> I hope this makes it more clear what I'm trying to do.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> deb
>>>
>>> On 12/15/10 10:08 PM, Seva Gluschenko wrote:
>>>> Deb,
>>>>
>>>> The default port is 5308, not 5306, and you don't want to change it
>>>> unless you definitely have no choice (say, 5308 is completely occupied
>>>> in your infrastructure by bad coincidence). But, if you explicitly
>>>> want to, look at "port" option of control bodies.
>>>>
>>>> 2010/12/16 Deb Heller<d...@es.net>:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> We will be deploying a remote testbed that will sit on inside a VPN
>>>>> network.  I've had a request that the developers would like to have the
>>>>> testbed hosts maintained by cfengine.  However, the cfengine servers are
>>>>> outside the VPN network.
>>>>>
>>>>> For similar purposes, when accessing a host inside the VPN network, I
>>>>> have NAT'd ports in the VPN gateway as a tunnel to the target server.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, our Nagios server accesses VPN hosts through a VPN-Gateway
>>>>> by NAT'ing a port to the target host.  To access, one would use the
>>>>> VPN-GW-IPaddr:PortNumber where the Port Number directs the packets via
>>>>> the VPN-GW to the appropriate port on the target host.
>>>>>
>>>>> A specific port number maps to each target host and the appropriate port
>>>>> number on that specific target host.  It is my understanding that
>>>>> Cfengine uses port 5306 communicate.  But, now I need the cfengine
>>>>> server to talk to the VPN-GW, to get through to the target host.  That
>>>>> host will actually be represented by the IP addr of the VPN-GW +
>>>>> PortNumber (representing the target host) which will ultimately be
>>>>> directed to port 5306 on the target host.
>>>>>
>>>>> bintointerface in agent seems to be the closest to what I need, but it
>>>>> doesn't seem to have the ability to also assign a port.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> deb
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Deb Heller-Evans                1 Cyclotron Road
>>>>> Computer Systems Engineer       Berkeley, CA 94720
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Help-cfengine mailing list
>>>>> Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
>>>>> https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-cfengine mailing list
> Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
> https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
_______________________________________________
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine

Reply via email to