Hi! ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Sunday, March 3, 2019 3:01 AM, Luis Falcon <fal...@gnu.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:16:05 +0100 > Axel Braun axel.br...@gmx.de wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019, 15:04:38 CET schrieb Luis Falcon: > > > > > Quick followup ... > > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:54:29 +0000 > > > Luis Falcon fal...@gnu.org wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Chris ! > > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 01:58:22 +0000 > > > > Chris Zimmerman ch...@teffalump.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > I think two things for testing: > > > > > > > > > > - Module actually works > > > > > - Smooth and intuitive workflow > > > > > > > > > > I've been testing against the demo Orthanc server > > > > > http://demo.orthanc-server.com and my own Orthanc docker > > > > > instance. Real-world examples, of course, sometimes act > > > > > differently. Also, needs to be an easy flow, so hopefully > > > > > people can tell me what they like and dislike. > > > > > > > > Great !! > > > > > > > > > There is still the issue about DICOM viewers. That is, how to > > > > > view the images. Orthanc ships with a dicom-viewer plugin that > > > > > works through its web interface but it is, admittedly, not a > > > > > robustly sophisticated viewer. Furthermore, even setting up a > > > > > dicom-viewer and dicom-server to work together is non-trivial. > > > > > > > > Yes. I think we should work on the link with a nice / simple DICOM > > > > viewer. > > > > I've been using Aliza lately > > > > (https://www.aliza-dicom-viewer.com/), a QT application. It is > > > > simple, has an RPM package and works quite well. > > > > We can check with Sebastien who is an expert in this area and get > > > > his thoughts. > > > > @Axel, do you think we can have the Aliza package for openSUSE ? > > > > > > Although it's linked with QT & licensed under LGPL, I have not seen > > > the source code from Aliza, so until that is clear we can not > > > integrate it and should keep on the quest to find the ultimate > > > Libre DICOM viewer :D > > > > I could not find any license for the aliza package - LGPL just refers > > to the linked QT libraries. > > The guys are in Bonn (could have knocked their door yesterday ;-) I > > will drop them a mail - or did you do already? > > That would be great ! My German is as good as my Chinese :D > > > For the rest, I have othanc-webviewer and othanc-dicomweb in the > > build queue. I finished gdcm, which is a C++ library for DICOM > > medical files, and a build requirement for the webviewer. Same as > > cornerstone, a nodejs package, which waits to be build. > > So, any lightweight package is welcome..... > > Aeskulap needs some work / update, but it isvery light and a great > piece of software. We just need somebody to update the source code to > the latest specs and maintain it. It could be a great companion and > integrate it with GNU Health. It would be nice to have that developed again but I'm somewhat worried about trying to restart a basically dead (10+ yr since last commit) software project. Personally, I have no experience with C++. I tried out Aliza, too, and have no complaints. I defer to others for the viewer selection, but the simple viewer provided by orthanc seems too basic. Regards, C > Let me know your thoughts > Luis > > > Cheers > > Axel
