Am 5. März 2019 22:26:22 GMT-03:00 schrieb Chris Zimmerman
<ch...@teffalump.com>:
>Hi!
>
>‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>On Sunday, March 3, 2019 3:01 AM, Luis Falcon <fal...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:16:05 +0100
>> Axel Braun axel.br...@gmx.de wrote:
>>
>> > Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019, 15:04:38 CET schrieb Luis Falcon:
>> >
>> > > Quick followup ...
>> > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:54:29 +0000
>> > > Luis Falcon fal...@gnu.org wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Chris !
>> > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 01:58:22 +0000
>> > > > Chris Zimmerman ch...@teffalump.com wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi!
>> > > > > I think two things for testing:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Module actually works
>> > > > > - Smooth and intuitive workflow
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I've been testing against the demo Orthanc server
>> > > > > http://demo.orthanc-server.com and my own Orthanc docker
>> > > > > instance. Real-world examples, of course, sometimes act
>> > > > > differently. Also, needs to be an easy flow, so hopefully
>> > > > > people can tell me what they like and dislike.
>> > > >
>> > > > Great !!
>> > > >
>> > > > > There is still the issue about DICOM viewers. That is, how to
>> > > > > view the images. Orthanc ships with a dicom-viewer plugin
>that
>> > > > > works through its web interface but it is, admittedly, not a
>> > > > > robustly sophisticated viewer. Furthermore, even setting up a
>> > > > > dicom-viewer and dicom-server to work together is
>non-trivial.
>> > > >
>> > > > Yes. I think we should work on the link with a nice / simple
>DICOM
>> > > > viewer.
>> > > > I've been using Aliza lately
>> > > > (https://www.aliza-dicom-viewer.com/), a QT application. It is
>> > > > simple, has an RPM package and works quite well.
>> > > > We can check with Sebastien who is an expert in this area and
>get
>> > > > his thoughts.
>> > > > @Axel, do you think we can have the Aliza package for openSUSE
>?
>> > >
>> > > Although it's linked with QT & licensed under LGPL, I have not
>seen
>> > > the source code from Aliza, so until that is clear we can not
>> > > integrate it and should keep on the quest to find the ultimate
>> > > Libre DICOM viewer :D
>> >
>> > I could not find any license for the aliza package - LGPL just
>refers
>> > to the linked QT libraries.
>> > The guys are in Bonn (could have knocked their door yesterday ;-) I
>> > will drop them a mail - or did you do already?
>>
>> That would be great ! My German is as good as my Chinese :D
>>
>> > For the rest, I have othanc-webviewer and othanc-dicomweb in the
>> > build queue. I finished gdcm, which is a C++ library for DICOM
>> > medical files, and a build requirement for the webviewer. Same as
>> > cornerstone, a nodejs package, which waits to be build.
>> > So, any lightweight package is welcome.....
>>
>> Aeskulap needs some work / update, but it isvery light and a great
>> piece of software. We just need somebody to update the source code to
>> the latest specs and maintain it. It could be a great companion and
>> integrate it with GNU Health.
>
>It would be nice to have that developed again but I'm somewhat worried
>about trying to restart a basically dead (10+ yr since last commit)
>software project. Personally, I have no experience with C++. I tried
>out Aliza, too, and have no complaints. I defer to others for the
>viewer selection, but the simple viewer provided by orthanc seems too
>basic.
You are refering to the webviewer plugin here?
