Hi there ! On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 07:29:51 +0700 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com> wrote:
> On 2016-04-17 13:59, Luis Falcon wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 07:54:09 +0700 > > Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com> wrote: > > > > > On 2016-04-16 23:30, Cédric Krier wrote: > > > > I'm talking about people who > > > > live in two places at the same time. For example, there are > > > > seasonal workers who move every 6 months. I don't think we can > > > > expect from the health professional to update the record of > > > > such patient every 6 months. > > > > > > I have another example: children of divorced couple, they often > > > live in both parent places by intermittence. > > > > > Sure, and they also stay at friends houses, at their grandparents, > > go to summer camps, etcetera .. > > > > A person can have a current DU at given time, and is all recorded on > > the demographics history . > > Please could you explain, how do you historize a frequently switch? > Each person / patient assessment records the date along with the current demographics (including the Domiciliary unit), socioeconomic status, family functionality ... . Please see the screenshots[1][2] showing the tree and form view. > > It's important to know that GU Health Domiciliary Unit[1] and > > Tryton address are two different concepts, that can perfectly > > co-exist in their respective contexts, as explained > > For me, this conclusion is too fast. I see no argument in favor of > separation which can not be solved in case of merge. A DU has to have demographic / epidemiological significance. It must be unique (for example, a cadastral code) , it shows all the members at any given time, it has the infrastructure materials, it allows us to make surveys[3] Currently, the address concept does not have those attributes. Take the PO Box[4]: The Postal Office Box is a valid address, yet it is not a DU. Another example where we would use the address model is with relatives living in another country. The address makes great contact information , yet, we probably don't have the demographic / infrastructure attributes to transform it into a DU. > > > Of course, GNU Health also records the contact of the relative, Next > > of kin, friends, school, work, ... associated to the person, so we > > cover all scenarios. > > I don't see what the link with the current question. > It's under the party general tab. Look at the screenshot example[5], for the contact associated to the "ex-husband". You can also specify if it's a school, work, address. Bests, 1 .- http://i.imgur.com/o0XxXV2.png 2 .- http://i.imgur.com/ML7Pd2L.png 3 .- https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/GNU_Health/Neglected_Tropical_Diseases#Chagas_Related_Surveys 4 .- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-office_box 5.- http://i.imgur.com/3BD7F2P.png -- Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D., BSc President, GNU Solidario GNU Health: Freedom and Equity in Healthcare http://health.gnu.org
