Thanks Mohammed for the suggestion though I will say you must have a bit of a perverse streak if you consider this 'enjoyment' -- smile.
Going back to the issue of "username" in our version string, it looks like Arun won't have to buy a new machine after all. HADOOP-10313 just got checked in, a script to build release bits up on our shared Apache infrastructure. Yours, St.Ack On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Mohammad Islam <misla...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I was "enjoying" this discussion from the > sideline. > > I strongly believe the issue could be resolved > through in-person discussion of the related parties and move forward. > After that meeting, a synopsis email could be sent > if that would help and fit the bigger community. > > Regards, > Mohammad > > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:32 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > > > > > Stack, > > > > Apologies for the late response, I just saw this. > > > > On Jan 29, 2014, at 3:33 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > Slightly related, I just ran into this looking back at my 2.2.0 download: > > > > [stack@c2020 hadoop-2.2.0]$ ./bin/hadoop version > > Hadoop 2.2.0 > > Subversion https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common -r 1529768 > > Compiled by hortonmu on 2013-10-07T06:28Z > > ... > > > > Does the apache binary have to be compiled by 'hortonmu'? Could it be > > compiled by 'arun', or 'apachemu'? > > > > Thanks, > > St.Ack > > > > > > Thank you for tarring all my work here with a brush by insinuating not > > sure what for using my company provided dev machine to work on Hadoop. > > > > > > What is up Arun? A basic query gets warped unrecognizably and given a > dirty taint. This in spite of us 'knowing' each other and having worked > together for years now on this stuff. > > While it is true that I changed employers recently, my allegiance when > around these parts has always been to Apache. I've had a few different > employers during my time contributing to Hadoop (This is my 4th). I > challenge you to find anything in my record that has me rah rah-ing my > current or previous employers. > > > > > I'll try find a non-company provided dev machine to create future > builds, > > it might take some time because I'll have to go purchase another one. Or, > > maybe, another option is to legally change my name. > > > > > Lets chat before you go to such a radical extreme. In another thread, it > is implied that changing the build user would be a simple enough affair -- > but I know nothing of your infrastructure. > > > > > Meanwhile, while we are on this topic, I just did: > > > > $ git clone git://git.apache.org/hbase.git > > $ grep -ri cloudera * > > > > Should I file a jira to fix all refs including the following imports of > > org.cloudera.* (pasted below) … can you please help fix that? There are > > more, but I'll leave it to your discretion. Compared to my username on my > > company provided dev. box, this seems far more egregious. Do you agree? > > > > > This is another project including a third-party project. That seems like a > tenuous connection to me but no problem if you would put it in the same > bucket. We can file an issue, or probably better as a precursor, get to a > place where we can discuss these concerns in a civil manner and then file > the agreed-upon issues to fix (We need this lib to add tracing to hdfs IMO > -- so if this is in the way of its making it in, lets fix). > > > > > In future, it might be useful to focus our efforts on moving the project > > forward by contributing/reviewing code/docs etc., rather than on petty > > things like usernames. > > > > > This is a common theme, that the issues I raise are 'petty' or 'trifles' > but I have trouble reconciling this assertion with the counter reaction > raised. You react as though I were throwing molotov cocktails. > > > Thanks, > St.Ack >
