My response was to your direct association of the green color to HWX green as if it were deliberately done. Nobody here intentionally left a vendor's signature like you claimed. And to your other comment "Does the apache binary have to be compiled by 'hortonmu'? Could it be compiled by 'arun', or 'apachemu'?" to the message in the build. As if somebody said it has to be.
You know how I'd have raised this? I'd say "Hey guys, seems like the build messages have hortonmu and that seems like an issue with our branding. Can we fix this?". Then I or somebody could have replied "Oh, that seems totally by mistake. Agreed, let's fix this". Instead, you post it in another orthogonal thread (which in itself is making claims of causing deliberate confusion of brand), make it look like an innocuous question asking if apache binary has to be compiled by the specific user-name. I said 'unbelievable'. Sorry, I should have used 'disappointing'. This is not the way I'd post 'concerns'. There is a reason why brand issues are gently discussed on private lists. And to think this thread is posted out in the open like this, it was me who was taken aback by your oh-not-so-explicit insinuations. +Vinod On Jan 29, 2014, at 8:35 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > I'm a little taken aback by these kind of responses. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
