adam vogt wrote:
This is most likely attributable to the use of different compilers.I don't see how accepting such a variant can cause ambiguity, but I'm not quite sure whether it is legal H98.
Just a bit curious then what compiler Brandon was using. I'm using GHC 6.10.2 on AMD64 Linux (Arch).
/M
On 5/6/09, Magnus Therning <[email protected]> wrote:Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:On May 6, 2009, at 12:18 , Nico Rolle wrote:why does this don't work? test = let a = (>) in 1 `a` 2Works fine here once I correct your indentation (the "in" needs to beindented at least as far as the "l" in "let"). Really? For me it's enough to have "in" indented more then "test", and one space is enough: test = let a = (>) in 1 `a` 2 /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
