This is most likely attributable to the use of different compilers. I don't see how accepting such a variant can cause ambiguity, but I'm not quite sure whether it is legal H98.
On 5/6/09, Magnus Therning <[email protected]> wrote: > Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > > On May 6, 2009, at 12:18 , Nico Rolle wrote: > > > > > why does this don't work? > > > > > > test = let a = (>) > > > in 1 `a` 2 > > > > > > > > > Works fine here once I correct your indentation (the "in" needs to be > indented at least as far as the "l" in "let"). > > > > Really? For me it's enough to have "in" indented more then "test", and one > space is enough: > > test = let a = (>) > in 1 `a` 2 > > /M > > -- > Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) > magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org > http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
