On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:29:00 +0200, Miguel Mitrofanov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> take 5 [1,2,3,4,5,undefined]
(What would GHCi print?
[1,2,3,4,5]
Then please square that with your comment that we don't care how much of
the list gets evaluated.)
I don't care if it evaluates it, reads it's answer from some internal
table, or consult it's lawyer. I just want it to agree with my reasoning
about complete partial orders; that's all I need. I don't know how to
explain this clearer.
This purity of Haskell will allways interfere with practical matters that
cannot be described in Haskell.
________ Information from NOD32 ________
This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Servers.
part000.txt - is OK
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
