On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Raphael Gaschignard <dasur...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I feel like I've seen such "suggestions" in > GHC errors before. > > If so, does that mean there's some sort of mechanism in the compiler > already in place for such error recognition? Like some simple pattern > stuff? If not, I think that it might not be bad to consider this stuff > (misused packaged, changed semantics that create compiler errors), and to > put something into place for future modifications. This could make it a lot > easier to deal with unmaintained code. > There's some very limited capability now; the GHC folks are tossing around ideas for something more general like that. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
