+1 Tom
El May 5, 2013, a las 7:55 AM, Raphael Gaschignard <dasur...@gmail.com> escribió: > > > On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Simon Marechal <si...@banquise.net> wrote: >> I ran into this kind of trouble when I was starting to learn Haskell. I >> had error messages like that : >> >> test.hs:1:8: >> Could not find module `List' >> It is a member of the hidden package `haskell98-2.0.0.2'. >> Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. >> >> I then proceeded to figure how to include this haskell98 package, and >> later ran into other problems. Perhaps this message could be hard coded >> to tell the user that this is deprecated code, and he should use >> Data.List instead. > > Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I feel like I've seen such "suggestions" in GHC > errors before. > > If so, does that mean there's some sort of mechanism in the compiler already > in place for such error recognition? Like some simple pattern stuff? If not, > I think that it might not be bad to consider this stuff (misused packaged, > changed semantics that create compiler errors), and to put something into > place for future modifications. This could make it a lot easier to deal with > unmaintained code. > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe