Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I moved modules/security to archive/modules/security and moved
modules/security2 to modules/security. I adjusted build scripts as needed.
Thanks. How about making the archive/ a peer of trunk/, branches/ &
tags/, then people downloading trunk won't get the archived stuff too?
Hm. I think of it still as "live material" in our tree, but I don't
feel too strongly about this. If we keep it there, we should set a
policy to expire it out of there at some point.
I wasn't able to go further or put a snapshot up because of really awful
network conditions in the hotel I'm in. (There seems to be something
systemically bad about Embassy Suites - this is the second time I've had
network problems in the last two times I stayed in one...)
I have built the refactored code (at rev 378478) and created the snapshot
archives. They are sitting on my disk at the moment. Do we need a
green light from the incubator PMC before uploading a new snapshot?
No. I'll check to see if I promised lazy notification messages on this.
BTW, is there an ant target for this snapshot creation yet?
Tim, do the change of the package names if you wish. I'll do the
snapshot based on a svn rev later today (unless someone else wants
to...) I suspect that it won't be a major deal if you get the new J9 VM
up at the same time as the svn change is made...
The plan is still on course to have the new VME version in place ready
for people to continue working seamlessly, and leave the old VME there
to run snapshots.
Right -
