Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > Tim Ellison wrote: >> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >>> I moved modules/security to archive/modules/security and moved >>> modules/security2 to modules/security. I adjusted build scripts as >>> needed. >> >> Thanks. How about making the archive/ a peer of trunk/, branches/ & >> tags/, then people downloading trunk won't get the archived stuff too? > > Hm. I think of it still as "live material" in our tree, but I don't > feel too strongly about this. If we keep it there, we should set a > policy to expire it out of there at some point.
whatever -- I don't really mind either. We have a module called 'archive' so don't want to add to confusion about the archive in trunk. >>> I wasn't able to go further or put a snapshot up because of really awful >>> network conditions in the hotel I'm in. (There seems to be something >>> systemically bad about Embassy Suites - this is the second time I've had >>> network problems in the last two times I stayed in one...) >> >> I have built the refactored code (at rev 378478) and created the snapshot >> archives. They are sitting on my disk at the moment. Do we need a >> green light from the incubator PMC before uploading a new snapshot? > > No. I'll check to see if I promised lazy notification messages on this. ok -- let me know, I'll wait. > BTW, is there an ant target for this snapshot creation yet? erm, (shuffle, shuffle), no. I run the default target and copy in the license, notices, and readme files. I'll add it to the list. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
