> What32 plus few more classes.
> 
> 3.82 MB on disk size.
> 
> "vouch32"  can be  "vouch", no problems.
> I told that it compiles with current Harbour and 
> works flawlessly with my production applications.
> 
> I can publish also the way it can be used with any 
> console application ( on Windows ) just like Clipper,
> or other compiler as Xbase++.

I had my share of experiences with WHAT32, and it was 
the only lib I had to decide to pull completely 
due to the many problems (and many many lost hours of 
work), and I could only scratch the surface of the 
problems, f.e. memory leaks and GPFs or duplicated 
functionality wasn't even touched, there was also 
the copyright issue with the headers. It was already 
a huge impact, even though it was less than 1MB :(
And WHAT32 was supposedly working code pulled right 
from live xhb repository.. It was especially 
difficult since I was all alone with the effort to 
take WHAT32 anywhere, nobody seemed interested enough 
to help. [ So now we develop hbwin lib. ]

Pls remember that "working" code has been proven 
to fail many times here on the various requirements 
of clean and really faultless code, not to mention when 
imposed to both Windows and WinCE platforms, all CPU 
targets (x86, x64, IA64, ARM) and all supported 
C compilers in all the modes we support in Harbour 
([!]UNICODE, [!]WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN, C and C++).

With all due respect to your work I maintain my opinion 
to keep it outside Harbour repository, it's much useful 
for both projects to stay separate. For Harbour 
I suggest to improve and fix what we have at hand.

At the same time I hope to see VOUCH[32] (the name 
we've heard, and the icon we've seen so many times) 
in a repository near us ;)

Viktor

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to