> I agree but i think might be a better starting point to have a working hbide > enviroment. > Hbide have some kind of issue with selecting path dialog on create new > project
IMO it would be better to have a working HBQT library. HBIDE is based on it, so until HBQT doesn't work properly, HBIDE never will. Our major goal is to have a working GUI library in the first place, then we can start to care about stuff built upon it, like an IDE or whatever else. HBIDE is currently useful though for testing HBQT problems. > BTW we can have multiple Ubuntu and sysop installed on the same pc using > VirtualBox Of course. > In my ubuntu 9.10 i have this release of qt installed i also use qt for > compiling qgis www.qgis.org/ from svn, so might be there is some different > in my packages : > > libqt4-dev 4:4.6.2 > > Pacchetto: libqt4-dev > Versione: 4:4.6.2-0ubuntu3~karmic1~ppa1 > Responsabile: Kubuntu Developers <kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com> > > So i have in the single Ubuntu 9.10 tha i use a not standard release of qt... > and i report GPF of hbide from this release of QT, might be not a good choice. > BTW i use to compile almost every day and i use qgis for my work without any > issue and hbide compile fine. > > Do you think this env might generate confusion testing hbide ? Yes it could, but I don't know enough details to tell for sure. At least now we see you have a special environment, which is important information to put your GPF reports in context. To tell further, you can check on QT/Ubuntu forums, what they say about such configuration. I'd personally recommend to use default configuration for a start though, especially since we don't even support QT 4.6.x in Harbour officially yet. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
