Shum wrote:
>
> Without hbxbp (which depends on hbqt), it seems the only GUI (some syntx)
> and greate for the Xbase++ to Harbour convertion.
>
It is _not_ the only GUI for Xbase++ to Harbour conversion.
The other, but Windows only, implementation exists in Harbour under
the name of GTWVG, though with different namespace. In GTWVG all
Xbp*() are called with Wvg*() prefix. A simple .ch with
#xtranslate XbpDialog( => WvgDialog( directive can do the job.
The only issue with Wvt*() implementation is that it will be unlikely
that I could be able to implement all classes, for example, and of formost
importance, XbpBrowse().
It is just to update you, but surely I can do much more in hbXBP and hbQT
than in GTWVG, so you are encouraged to look for hbXBP only instead of
GTWVG. If you have Windows only solution be your ultimate goal, you can
try GTWVG also.
> 2.) Some windows dlls call function (need tobe re-write under Harbour
> syntx)
>
No, this is not the right explanation.
If your application is built for Windows only, and you have to port to this
platform only, then writing the code for Windows only dlls make sense, in
which
case you will be writing WINAPI wrappers. But if you have multi-platform
vision in mind, then you may need another alternatives.
As per current goals, Harbour bindings for Qt are targetted at GUI framework
only.
But you can explore the ways if some other classes of Qt fits your needs, if
same
cannot be done under Harbour core. Just let me know.
> After complied error free convertion, I will start the Y-Coor. (Xbase++
> and hbxbp (hbqt)) convertion
>
This should be easy. Try to find a way to hook it into hbXBP itself instead
of
changing your application logic.
> Following are important part for convertion:
> - Both Harbour and Xbase++ with clipper compitable
> - Harbour has Xbase++ compitable GUI which is hbxbp (which depends on
> hbqt)
> - MultiThread Compitable
> - CT lib (beside com-232 function I just use few CT function) (now I use
> hbtpathy functon)
> - Xbase++ ODBC DBE (SQL) and Harbour RDDSQL with same style of SQL
> statement handling
> (my Application is already using ODBC DBE for access SQL for many years)
>
Thank you for the internal vision. I hope many will benefit from it.
-----
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
_a_student_of_software_analysis_&_design_
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Ask-Str2Poniter-and-Pointer2Str-function-pair-tp4803834p4812015.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
