On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote: Hi,
> >I've included BCC55 for comparison. It's running at half the > >overall speed compared to 4.5 64-bit. > Echhhh... I'm still using BCC, because... it compiles f.e. > \external\sqlite3 in 2.74 s, and MGW compiles it in 3 minutes 3.25 > s, i.e. 67 times slower... It's important only if you have to often recompile very big C files which can be hardly optimized. So you can use BCC when you are working on such files and MinGW to create final binaries. You can also try to reduce the optimization level, i.e. you can use -Os in MinGW flags. It should reduce the compilation time and final binaries will be slower then the one created by BCC though still faster. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
