Viktor, for real code, doing I/O on a network share, the difference could be lower, though.
Maurilio. Viktor Szakáts wrote: >> Viktor Szakáts wrote: >>> I've included BCC55 for comparison. It's running at half the overall speed >>> compared to 4.5 64-bit. >> Echhhh... I'm still using BCC, because... it compiles f.e. \external\sqlite3 >> in 2.74 s, and MGW compiles it in 3 minutes 3.25 s, i.e. 67 times slower... > > Yes, it's good for "draft" builds. > > Though at least for live builds used by real users > IMO it's worth to take the pain of a longer build > to offer a faster working application. It's a one > time overhead on developer's side and and permanent > and noticeable gain on the users' side. > > Brgds, > Viktor > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > -- __________ | | | |__| Maurilio Longo |_|_|_|____| farmaconsult s.r.l. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
