> francesco perillo wrote: > > > > Not only this little samples (I already wrote last week that little > > "dedicated" samples are better that a monolithic source full of > > everything... > > > > Probbaly some others should jump into this stream...
I agree with Francesco. Also in HwGUI experience i found that a specific sample, exhausting the most important aspects of the class/function/argument is more productive. > You do not have to. > > Probably you missed some of the earlier commits. > Here is the reminder: > > 1. Open console from where you compile hbQT > 2. Goto harbour/contrib/hbqt/gtqtc > 3. Issue > make install > 4. If library is built, then, go to further deep in /tests > 5. Issue > hbmk2.exe demoqtc , and if .exe is generated > 6. Run > demoqtc > 7. Play with options and inspect the demoqtc.prg, it is pure > Clipper code. > > Though there are few glitches and still is not production level ready, > but amply demonstrate the potentials. I did not work on remaining > glitches as, at that point of time, I was not familiar with > Qt inside-out. > Now I am more equipped. If there is ample interest, and shown > on this also, > then I can look into GTQTC again. > Few time ago i inspetcted this contrib lib and found very interesting. I don't tried to use it because i thought was a sleeping project. Thus i'm sure very interested to a clipper based approach to Qt gui. > Soon, you will find, at least starting with, documentation. > Wait a few days more. Good news. Many thanks for the very effective work in hbide and Qt embedding. Best regards. Maurizio _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
