On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu> wrote:
> For me it's rather interesting to see that we maintain any > feature in central SVN which bends basic functionality for > the sake of ONE user. It's well known since years, that it's > a non supported feature. You can NOT USE IT and keep strict compatibility, I can USE IT to make mine easier to write and to read. It's a win win ( and will allow xHarbour developers to test Harbour is they need ). > Same with hbmk, I'm keeping it just for > the sake of Lorenzo (yet). It simply blocks the path forward, > and this is unacceptable IMO. The code is free, so if someone > tries to keep strange (or non-strange) local features, it can > and should be done locally. They need special build anyway, and > it's not about "I won't update the SVN anymore". We've already discussed about hb*, but at the moment I don't see the reason to swap worldwide well known standards like shell scripting and gnu makefiles with a tool that only ONE developer knows and maintain. I use many tools from google and yahoo in my makefiles and I don't see how could I fit them in hbmk2 and surely you'll be not interested to support them. best regards, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
