2010/2/25 Przemysław Czerpak <dru...@acn.waw.pl>:

> In this particular case I do not see any reason that we have to remove
> such functionality. For me -kl compiler switch is quite nice solution
> which should not be covered by HB_LEGACY_LEVEL3 macro and marked to
> removed in the future.
> Anyhow if we do not want to officially support it then I think that
> recent modifications should be reverted and old compile time macro
> restored.
Many thanks.

> In general I think that we have to seriously rethink few things.
> ...
> Anyhow IMO over some reasonable limit adding HB_ prefix to each
> identifier which was not used in Clipper we begin to create Clipper
> museum instead of modern language.
>
> Fortunately we have SWITCH and FOR EACH statements instead of
> HB_SWITCH and HB_FOR EACH ;-)

I couldn't say it better.

best regards,
Lorenzo
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to