2010/2/25 Przemysław Czerpak <dru...@acn.waw.pl>: > In this particular case I do not see any reason that we have to remove > such functionality. For me -kl compiler switch is quite nice solution > which should not be covered by HB_LEGACY_LEVEL3 macro and marked to > removed in the future. > Anyhow if we do not want to officially support it then I think that > recent modifications should be reverted and old compile time macro > restored.
Many thanks. > In general I think that we have to seriously rethink few things. > ... > Anyhow IMO over some reasonable limit adding HB_ prefix to each > identifier which was not used in Clipper we begin to create Clipper > museum instead of modern language. > > Fortunately we have SWITCH and FOR EACH statements instead of > HB_SWITCH and HB_FOR EACH ;-) I couldn't say it better. best regards, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour