> Viktor,
> 
> Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>> 
>> Or maybe, and if technically possible:
>>  QOUT( ( NUMERIC ) x )
>> 
> Yes, a lot better, even if I still can't grasp the usefulness of such a code
> for a typeless language which would, anyway, print x.

That's a good question. It was too late to start wondering 
on this yesterday, but I also can't see what more casting 
can offer compared to VAL(), STR(), INT(). Or, what is the 
point to cast a string to array without knowing the conversion 
details. Maybe I'm missing something, but to me casting looks 
like a conversion function which expect one type and returns 
another.

Brgds,
Viktor

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to