Hi Pritpal

Pritpal Bedi wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> It is a programming fact on the surface to cover 
> some of the unwanted side-effects of Qt which I do not yet
> how they should be implemented in a way that does not 
> cause GPF.
> 
> I am constantly struggling to find the solution.
> But seems my meagre knowledge in CPP space is really 
> restrictive in this effort.
> 
> Nevertheless, the struggle is on. We found many solutions
> in the past and we will find many in the future. Hatbour-Qt
> is evolving, still.
> 
> 

In Qt you don't have to (or must not?) destroy child widgets.
Parent widget is responsible for destruction of it's children.
So you have to destroy only dynamicaly allocated top level (without parent)
widgets.

BRGDS
Franček




-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/SF.net-SVN%3A-harbour-project%3A-13957--trunk-harbour-tp27685058p27691072.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to