Viktor Szakáts wrote:
...in the heat of enthusiasm
the development path goes into a certain level
of "featuritis" and rush, where we want everything
at any future cost and now. IOW quantity is
favored instead of quality. IMO we should
not have "all" features, but only the important
ones in order of priority, in a stable and working
fashion.
I agree with you.
Situations like this, usually drives to a project to split between
(allegedly) 'conservative' and 'agressive' developers.
IMHO, that is a false dichotomy.
The truth is that a development tool must be compact, stable, reliable,
rock-solid thing and not a technical playground.
Such playground is funny and must exist, but it should be in a different
place.
Regards,
Roberto.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
