Hello Viktor
Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > As I told you before (but all my such messages seems > ignored), there are examples for _exactly that_ in hbmk2.prg. > No, never ignored. Just wanted a fast entry into it. > hbmk2 sets envvars and calls external programs. Look for > hb_setenv() and hb_process*() calls. > I am thinking I am going lazy with the age. I will remain more careful next time. > Although for me hbide would be dropped as potential dev tool, > if it will set compiler dependent variables :( First of all > this makes it non-portable, difficult to maintain, or requires > double logic, etcetc. > _hbide would be dropped as potential dev tool_ I could not follow you in this respect, can you explain a little more. I cannot comprehend why it will be a _non-portable tool_ ? No need to use QProcess(), we have everything in Harbour core. Yep, this is exactly what I want too. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Create-Process-API---Brief-Overview-Requested-tp26696490p26699158.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
