>>> 270 HB_FUNC( __TP_CTRLCTS )
>>> 271 {
>>> 272 #if !defined( CRTSCTS ) && defined( __WATCOMC__ )
>>> 273 # define CRTSCTS 020000000000
>>> 274 #endif
>>>
>>> is there a reason for the "&& defined( __WATCOMC__ )" part? i've just
>>> found another platform where CRTSCTS isn't defined, and am wondering
>>> whether anyone has anything against, or a better idea instead of, just
>>> dropping the watcom constraint from this conditional.
>>
>> Probably can be dropped. More could be told by checking
>> file history, maybe you can spot who added it and with
>> what comment.
>
> it says:
>
> 2008-07-17 03:36 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
> * harbour/contrib/hbtpathy/tplinux.c
> * workaround for missing CRTCTS declaration in OpenWatcom
>
> so i guess no harm dropping it.
Yes, it seems safe to remove the extra guard.
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
