Nope from here. Brgds, Viktor
On 2009 Nov 27, at 03:29, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote: > Hi, > > > current ADS RDD is registered using names: ADS, ADT, ADSCDX, ADSNTX, > ADSVFP. RDD SYSNAME method (i.e., RDDNAME()) can return one of the > following values: ADSADT, ADSCDX, ADSNTX, ADSVFP. Original C level ADS > defines for different database types are: ADS_CDX, ADS_NTX, ADS_VFP, > ADT_ADT. > > I propose to rename RDD from ADT to ADSADT, thus making both correct > RDDNAME() return value and to be compatible with naming scheme of > another ADS RDDs. Any objections? > > > Regards, > Mindaugas > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
