> Przemysław Czerpak wrote: >> I haven't time too look at this whole code so I cannot say what exactly >> is fixed by version 2.8.4 in comparison to 2.8.3. 2.8.4 is used with >> nedmalloc designed to improve performance in MT programs but I added to >> Harbour exactly the same functionality using pure 2.8.3 code (it's >> enabled by HB_FM_DLMT_ALLOC macro). > > Wow! I still had an idea in my mind to try port ptmalloc or nedmalloc in > spare time, because plain dlmalloc is not good for MT. > > Usually I look at details of your changes, but I've never noticed that we > have such feature from 2009-03-29. Thanks for _DLMT_!
Same here :) Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour