> Przemysław Czerpak wrote:
>> I haven't time too look at this whole code so I cannot say what exactly
>> is fixed by version 2.8.4 in comparison to 2.8.3. 2.8.4 is used with
>> nedmalloc designed to improve performance in MT programs but I added to
>> Harbour exactly the same functionality using pure 2.8.3 code (it's
>> enabled by HB_FM_DLMT_ALLOC macro). 
> 
> Wow! I still had an idea in my mind to try port ptmalloc or nedmalloc in 
> spare time, because plain dlmalloc is not good for MT.
> 
> Usually I look at details of your changes, but I've never noticed that we 
> have such feature from 2009-03-29. Thanks for _DLMT_!

Same here :)

Brgds,
Viktor

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to