Great I suggest write a little sample for better discover this strong way 2009/10/21 Przemysław Czerpak <dru...@acn.waw.pl>: > On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Alex Strickland wrote: > > Hi, > >> That is pretty cool. Thank you. What is the difference between _FIELD >> and FIELD? > > Both forms have exactly the same meaning for compiler. > You can use FILED if you like it more ;-) > > BTW It's yet another example where some dummy token significant for PP > but ignored by compiler can greatly help. > Now I had to translate: > WORKAREA1->name > to: > WORKAREA1->( _FIELD->name ) > because I was not able to use simple rule like: > #xtranslate WORKAREA1->name => WORKAREA1->name > due to infinite cyclic translation. Fortunately in this case I was able > to find alternative version. In some other cases it's not possible. > If we add dummy tokens then they will resolve such problems and rules > like above can be written as: > #xtranslate WORKAREA1->name => WORKAREA1-><@.>name > If no one has sth against then in some spare time I'll add support for > dummy tokens in result patterns using form like: <@token_value> > > best regards, > Przemek > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour >
-- Massimo Belgrano _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
