On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Alex Strickland wrote: Hi,
> That is pretty cool. Thank you. What is the difference between _FIELD > and FIELD? Both forms have exactly the same meaning for compiler. You can use FILED if you like it more ;-) BTW It's yet another example where some dummy token significant for PP but ignored by compiler can greatly help. Now I had to translate: WORKAREA1->name to: WORKAREA1->( _FIELD->name ) because I was not able to use simple rule like: #xtranslate WORKAREA1->name => WORKAREA1->name due to infinite cyclic translation. Fortunately in this case I was able to find alternative version. In some other cases it's not possible. If we add dummy tokens then they will resolve such problems and rules like above can be written as: #xtranslate WORKAREA1->name => WORKAREA1-><@.>name If no one has sth against then in some spare time I'll add support for dummy tokens in result patterns using form like: <@token_value> best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
