Okay, fine with me.
Brds,
Viktor
On 2009 Oct 6, at 21:13, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
I agree. I'd rather user hb_upperAscii() though, to
keep names well aligned (i.e. it's a sub-type of
upper()).
Fine though if we plan to add also other ASCII oriented functions
for LOWER, ISALPHA, ISUPPER, ISLOWER, ISDIGIT operations then IMO
using hb_ascii*() prefix will be better to keep names aligned.
Just like now we have set of hb_utf8*() functions:
HB_UTF8CHR(), HB_UTF8LEN(), HB_UTF8LEFT(), HB_UTF8RIGHT(),
HB_UTF8STUFF(), HB_UTF8SUBSTR(), HB_UTF8STRTRAN(),
HB_UTF8PEEK(), HB_UTF8POKE(), HB_UTF8TOSTR()
best regards,
Przemek
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
