On Tue, 06 Oct 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: > I agree. I'd rather user hb_upperAscii() though, to > keep names well aligned (i.e. it's a sub-type of > upper()).
Fine though if we plan to add also other ASCII oriented functions for LOWER, ISALPHA, ISUPPER, ISLOWER, ISDIGIT operations then IMO using hb_ascii*() prefix will be better to keep names aligned. Just like now we have set of hb_utf8*() functions: HB_UTF8CHR(), HB_UTF8LEN(), HB_UTF8LEFT(), HB_UTF8RIGHT(), HB_UTF8STUFF(), HB_UTF8SUBSTR(), HB_UTF8STRTRAN(), HB_UTF8PEEK(), HB_UTF8POKE(), HB_UTF8TOSTR() best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
