Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Maurilio Longo wrote: > > Hi Maurilio and David, > > I cannot say too much about OS2 real usage because I do not know this > system. IMHO it will be good to create doc/os2howto.txt file to collect > such information as David presented because it may be very useful in > some farther developing saving the time. > I think it is still used by some large oranization and a few die-hard-first-time-users-bla-bla :) like David and me which still use it since we're accustomed to it.
I don't have sales figures for www.ecomstation.com, though, but I don't think there are more than a few thousand users world-wide still actively using it. > Here I do not agree. OS2 Watcom compiler support introduced one of the > most important future to keep OS2 port alive. Now we can make OS2 build > tests on Linux and Windows what greatly helps in code updating so we do > not have to ask you or David about verification of even single commit > to update the code after seeing your compile logs and repeat the request. > For me it was a milestone in Harbour OS2 support. Please also note that > OpenWatcom builds Harbour in C++ mode what also forces keeping the code > clean with valid casting. > Thanks for the info, I stand corrected .) Best regards. Maurilio. -- __________ | | | |__| Maurilio Longo |_|_|_|____| farmaconsult s.r.l. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
