On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Pritpal Bedi<bediprit...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> hbxbp is/and will be 100% Xbase++ compatible. > So we will always have excellent documentation available. This is a plus for me, since it also define a blueprint to follow. > As it will be 100% Xbase++ core compatible, I think > Expresss++ will be a matter of recompilation if Roger is > not utilizing Xbase++ C interface. > > I do not aware of the latest Express status but in 2002 era > it was pure PRG code. I was referring to express++ more as a concept than as a specific implementation. The idea is to create a layer that helps to save SAY/GET.. READ code. > I need more hands to try this lib with real Xbase++ code and > report differences on the list. I've never used xbase so I can't help you much. I'm trying to understand which kind of interest there is among the core developers about hbqt and hbxbp. Many thanks again for your work. best regards, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
