Hi Lorenzo

Lorenzo Fiorini-2 wrote:
> 
> As you know I'm more interested in the "web path" but nevertheless I
> think that Harbour should have a classic desktop multi-platform GUI
> option to succeed.
> 
> In the past I've tried to push xhgtk but I'm really impressed by the
> work that Pritpal and others have done on hbqt and hbxbp.
> 
> hbxbp seems more "Clipper like" than other libs and it could be even
> closer with something like eXpress++
> http://www.donnay-software.com/expprod19.htm that "that aids in the
> migration of Clipper applications to full-GUI".
> 
> Comments?
> 

Welcome in the club.

hbxbp is/and will be 100% Xbase++ compatible.
So we will always have excellent documentation available.
As it will be 100% Xbase++ core compatible, I think 
Expresss++ will be a matter of recompilation if Roger is 
not utilizing Xbase++ C interface.

I do not aware of the latest Express status but in 2002 era
it was pure PRG code.

As I am purely concentrating on the implemetation part,
I need more hands to try this lib with real Xbase++ code and
report differences on the list. 

Regards
Pritpal Bedi

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/hbxbp-and-a-GUI-for-Harbour-tp24223562p24223763.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to