Found this:
---
2006-10-04 02:30 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
...
* harbour/utils/hbtest/rt_class.prg
* use: METHOD PROCEDURE ... CALSS ...
instead of: PROCEDURE ... CALSS ...
The first version is preferable syntax.
...
---
--- test.prg
#include "hbclass.ch"
PROCEDURE MAIN()
Hello():Test( "hello world" )
RETURN
CREATE CLASS Hello
// METHOD PROCEDURE Test( c ) /* <---- Compiler error */
METHOD Test( c ) /* This works */
END CLASS
METHOD PROCEDURE Test( c ) CLASS Hello
? c
RETURN
---
This is the closest to consistent syntax I could find. I'm not sure
why METHOD PROCEDURE doesn't work in class declaration,
it's probably for a reason.
Brgds,
Viktor
2009/6/21 toni...@fwi <toninho...@yahoo.com.br>:
> Hi Viktor
>
>>This is good, but in this case IMO METHOD declaration and
>>definition should use some sort of consistent syntax.
>>
>>Declaring as METHOD and implementing as PROCEDURE is
>>very sloppy.
>
> I 100% agree with you but IIRC this problem was discussed in past. I
> don't remember why we choice for METHOD in declaration and PROCEDURE
> in implementation.
>
>>If someone knows the consistent syntax, we can use it, it
>>would surely be a bit faster than FUNCTION + RETURN NIL.
>>Maybe METHOD PROCEDURE? I can't remember.
>
> I don't remember too...
>
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
> Toninho.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
> http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
