Hi Viktor

>This is good, but in this case IMO METHOD declaration and
>definition should use some sort of consistent syntax.
>
>Declaring as METHOD and implementing as PROCEDURE is
>very sloppy.

I 100% agree with you but IIRC this problem was discussed in past. I
don't remember why we choice for METHOD in declaration and PROCEDURE
in implementation.

>If someone knows the consistent syntax, we can use it, it
>would surely be a bit faster than FUNCTION + RETURN NIL.
>Maybe METHOD PROCEDURE? I can't remember.

I don't remember too... 


Thanks and best regards,

Toninho.

__________________________________________________
Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to