Hi Viktor >This is good, but in this case IMO METHOD declaration and >definition should use some sort of consistent syntax. > >Declaring as METHOD and implementing as PROCEDURE is >very sloppy.
I 100% agree with you but IIRC this problem was discussed in past. I don't remember why we choice for METHOD in declaration and PROCEDURE in implementation. >If someone knows the consistent syntax, we can use it, it >would surely be a bit faster than FUNCTION + RETURN NIL. >Maybe METHOD PROCEDURE? I can't remember. I don't remember too... Thanks and best regards, Toninho. __________________________________________________ Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour