2009/6/3 Alexander S.Kresin <a...@belacy.belgorod.su> > One reason will be that new harbour version is better and more stable and >> more powerfull >> > > Harbour versions before 1.00 was quite stable, too. I, for example, worked > with the code, dated by 2008-01-25 ( don't know, what version it is :) ) > till last month and have migrated to 1.01 because ... I don't know why :), > but not due to problems or limitations with an old one
Here we are discussing naming next version 2.0 becase it have a lof of impementation and bug remove so better having all userbase migrated on next version > > In corner of letodb suggestion Is possible think a letodb server version >> as a service? >> > > Yes, I think. I haven't concern in this, because I don't know, what > advantages letodb could get being a service. > Basically advantage it start with system startup WIll be loaded in server also without login (without trip) -- Massimo Belgrano
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
