Marcos
Marcos Gambeta-2 wrote: > > I have a suggestion about methods that return pointers and i would like > to know your opinion (and the opinion of the others developers too). > > While a function return a pointer, my suggestion is that methods must > return objects and not pointers. > Your point is valid. Initial I also thought of it. But it needs updating the generated classes manually. What I plan, and has explained earlier also ( see the changelog ), these sources and classes thereof will become the ancestor for higher level class framework based on Xbase++ XBPParts classes. Goal is not to change auto generated code, instead change derived classes. Wait a day more. I have restructured the base sources and probably 97% of QT wrapper code will be able to be compiled and working flawlessly. Anyway on this topic, we can discuss further. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/HbQt---methods-returning-pointers-%28suggestion%29-tp22875237p22878785.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
