Thanks for the feedback to all. It seem we agree on disabling it now, and keeping it for reference, and also to encourage 3rd parties to give feedback on whether they use it or not. AFAIK no "major" 3rd party needs it, but let's hear them words.
Notice however that if we keep it in repository, it will anyhow take a certain level of maintenance and attention and this draws off some time from more important areas, so we should reconsider this topic again sometimes in the future. I also hope that hbwin can one day become a good successor of hbwhat, without the mistakes of the latter. Windows interface is very important, especially for 3rd parties who can easily build upon it. Also, Windows isn't just the desktop, but WinCE, which may even be important for those who otherwise don't use Windows at their main development platform. I'll disable it in one of the next commits. And if we don't hear from any major dependent 3rd party, I'd like to reconsider moving it to contrib/examples in the near future, to better reflect its status (coding reference) (it will be buildable there also). Brgds, Viktor On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Francesco Saverio Giudice < i...@fsgiudice.com> wrote: > Hi Przemek, > > Il 25/02/2009 22.33, Przemyslaw Czerpak ha scritto: > >> if someone is interested then I can add to HVM support for >> sending messages to pointer items. At least on C level. >> > if you find spare time to add it will be useful. > TIA > Best regards, > Francesco > > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour >
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
