Hello Francesco
Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote: > > BTW I'm locked on structure handling. Without a solution on it or > without a standardization on passing values it will be a stopping point > in hbwin developing. > I have tried Przemek's proposal, but it's very difficult to handling > parameters to/from C code in a standard/easy way. > Could be use hashes or arrays ( like point[ 'x' ] ) ? but we need some > macros to write them fastly at C level (at prg level an object can be > used). > I've not tried too much due to lack of spare time. > Pritpal do you have found a solution ? > Mindaugas do you have any suggestion ? > No, I tried Przemek's code, which I have already committed in wvgwinc, but with no results. To write a function for accessing a member of a given structure is not the elegant way ( I am not saying - right way ). Xhb solution seems to fit nicely the way WINAPI implements it. The only difference being message operator "." vs ":". But it is even better because we come from Clipper heritage. Leave aside the technical part, if we do not devise a better mechanism to define and access structure, I am afraid a common wrapper for WINAPI will never see the light of the day. Przemek, Mindaugus can surely come up with same solution but with better internal overhaul of the concept so that the potential "dangers" discussed can be reduced to bare minimum. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Proposing-hbwhat-for-removal-tp22205966p22210811.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
