Viktor Szakáts wrote:

Not very good. Since you _must_ subscribe to and monitor yet another list, even if you just want to be informed about the changes, just like before.

What is the problem with my proposal?
You are creating a feed to the mail system that there is no way to opt out of, thus giving regular subscribers no way to reduce their mail burden. Sure you can filter i away, but only after you have downloaded it. And it's going to have a size limit of 150k. That's a lot of downloading just to throw it away.

What I am proposing is an opt in system. You only have to join it once, it lasts indefinitely. You create a filter to put it in the correct mailbox, that lasts indefinitely. This is a very minor burden to give choice to others before the mail download instead of after the mail download.

Your method reduces choice and increases mail burden. People with modems do care about this stuff. I believe in efficiency whenever I can get it. Choice is good when it's not excessive and burdensome, which this is not. Subscribe once, add one rule and you get exactly what you want.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to