Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote:
Ok, I'll do, if Mindaugas agree. Do you have a name proposal ?
I think we can name it webserver (what fantasy ;-) ).
One version I have is based on Mindaugas version with socket.c and it is fast and stable. Another is based on inet*() version, that offers actually multiplatform support and extensions, but it has some problems.
So if it is ok I will upload first version.
Both have one problem at end of application if using HRBs modules (Unrecoverable 9001 error) but only on exit and I have not found the cause, otherwise they works.

Feel free to do anything with proposed uhttpd (also commit). I just have some ideas how to extend it, but I'm not sure if these ideas will be similar to SVN changes by other people. It can happen, that after some time I will propose something completely different and incompatible from SVN.

I do not remember if I've mentioned the initial idea of name "uhttpd". Here "u" stands for "micro", since the first version was a tiny 300 prg lines http server.


Best regards,
Mindaugas

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to