Szakáts Viktor wrote: > > Windows, OS/2 and DOS doesn't need an (extended) installer, > and this makes them very flexible to use. IMO, if there is > any chance to replicate that (and I believe there is), > we shouldn't cut the way to allow this on as much platforms
Viktor, in OS/2 there is an envvar, LIBPATH=, which always contains '.' and is used by OS/2 to find needed DLLs; so every program looks at the dirctory it was started from when looking for .DLLs. I don't think this is available on MacOSX. > as possible. In OS X, installation is rather the exception > than the rule, which is just one more reason to allow support > for it (especially if it doesn't hurt anyone). > I agree with you here, and with something you wrote later, MacOSX is not linux, so it is wrong to see it just like a unix dialect with some fancy window manager. That said, what about having MacOSX specific commands instead of changing the ones that work on most the other *nixes? Maurilio. > Brgds, > Viktor > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > -- __________ | | | |__| Maurilio Longo |_|_|_|____| farmaconsult s.r.l. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
