I did one more test and I've found that -bm has a great impact, on memory
mostly, speedtst ST:

T029 with -bm 22 sec.
T030 with -bm 25 sec.

T029 w/o -bm 1.6 sec.
T030 w/o -bm 2.0 sec.

Best regards.

Maurilio.


PS. speedtst MT takes nearly twice.

Maurilio Longo wrote:
> Przemyslaw, David,
> 
> BTW, from watcom docs I read:
> 
> The "bm" option must be specified since we are creating a multi-threaded
> application. If your multi-threaded application contains more than one module,
> each module must be compiled using the "bm" switch.
> 
> So, it is not enough to buil hbvmmt with bm but all libs, but, doing so, what
> happens when I create an ST harbour program? That I'm, actually, always
> building MT executable?
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> Maurilio.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
 __________
|  |  | |__| Maurilio Longo
|_|_|_|____| farmaconsult s.r.l.


_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to