I'd suggest to try to solve this problem using existing facilities. Pouring new variations into the core seems not the best idea when we have already quite some open problems around this area.
Brgds, Viktor On 2008.11.12., at 7:40, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Przemek May be I could not present my case properly. I understand your implementation of new GT and also how it is behaving. My request is based on the new OBJECT modal I am building on lines with Xbase++ where I needed such functionality. I only need GTINFO manipulation is such way nothing else. Below is my proposed changes to bring this feature: hbapigt.h [#146] ------------- typedef struct { PHB_ITEM pNewVal; PHB_ITEM pResult; PHB_ITEM pNewVal2; PHB_ITEM pGT; // New Member } HB_GT_INFO, * PHB_GT_INFO; hbgtcore.c [#1614] ------------------gtInfo.pNewVal = gtInfo.pNewVal2 = gtInfo.pResult = gtInfo.pGT = NULL; //new members gtfunc.c [#116] --------------- HB_FUNC( HB_GTINFOEX ) // New Function { if( ISPOINTER( 1 ) && ISNUM( 2 ) ) { HB_GT_INFO gtInfo; gtInfo.pGT = hb_param( 1, HB_IT_ANY ); gtInfo.pNewVal = hb_param( 3, HB_IT_ANY ); gtInfo.pNewVal2 = hb_param( 4, HB_IT_ANY ); gtInfo.pResult = NULL; hb_gtInfo( hb_parni( 2 ), >Info ); if( gtInfo.pResult ) hb_itemReturnRelease( gtInfo.pResult ); } else hb_errRT_BASE_SubstR( EG_ARG, 3012, NULL, HB_ERR_FUNCNAME, HB_ERR_ARGS_BASEPARAMS ); } gtwvg.c [#2397] ---------------static BOOL hb_gt_wvt_Info( PHB_GT pGTx, int iType, PHB_GT_INFO pInfo ) //initial change { PHB_GT pGT = NULL; PHB_GTWVT pWVT; int iVal;HB_TRACE( HB_TR_DEBUG, ( "hb_gt_wvt_Info(%p,%d,%p)", pGT, iType, pInfo )); if( pInfo->pGT && hb_itemType( pInfo->pGT ) & HB_IT_POINTER ) { pGT = hb_gt_ItemBase( pInfo->pGT ); if( pGT ) hb_gt_BaseFree( pGT ); else pGT = pGTx; } if( !pGT ) { pGT = pGTx; } .... .... Above changes does not disturb current GT implementation. I have tested extensively with both GTWVT and GTWVG. Instead it empowers me to manipulate GTs running in different threads from current thread. I have some interesting usage in place and hopefully by ths weekend I be able to upload partial but working xbase++ cmpatible class structure in GTWVG, pure console. If agreed let me know if I can commit above changes. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/hb_gtInfoEx%28-pGT%2C-nGtInfo%2C-xValue%2C-xValue2-%29---Feature-Request-tp20414605p20455052.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
