Szakáts Viktor wrote: > I wouldn't make it overly complicated, as I wrote in > one of the mails, probably an IDLE, NORMAL, HIGHER > level would be enough. Of course there is the task > to tune these to give similar "feels" under different > OSes, which may be a bit of a problem, at least for > HIGHER. IDLE is similar on all platform. I'd rather
I agree. > not implement TIMECRITICAL on the .prg level though. > Harbour isn't a low level language, and with this > level, it's easy to mess things up, even unintentionally. > It is just the way the class above regular is called on OS/2 (where every class has 15 subclasses, so it was just a name I was familiar with and not something related to real-time processing); every other name is fine as long as such a thread has more priority than a standard one. :) Best regads. Maurilio. -- __________ | | | |__| Maurilio Longo |_|_|_|____| farmaconsult s.r.l. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
