Hi Miguel,
I find this extremely confusing and difficult to
maintain and use, and pretty much defeats the
purpose of _Replaceable_ Database Driver concept,
so I vote a strong no.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.09.22., at 9:21, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote:
View the controversy it creates, I propose to upload the following
rdds:
dbf1.c strict compatibility with C/52 (RT and Types) DBFCDX52.LIB
dbf2.c strict compatibility with CL53 (RT, BM and Types)DBFCDX53.LIB
dbf3.c strict compatibility with VFoxPro (RT and Types) DBFCDXVF.LIB
dbf4.c strict compatibility with ADS (RT and Types) DBFCDXAD.LIB
dbf5.c extended from the current RDD harbour DBFCDXHB.LIB
...
dbf6.c strict compatibility with DBaseIV MDBCDX.LIB
db1.c strict compatibility with Paradox DBPX.LIB
this can lighten the rdds make something even faster.
All people are agree ?
I can upload it this week.
Best regards,
Miguel Angel marchuet
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
